![]() And if you start with the twin assumptions that abortion doesn't kill someone, but some of these couples well might (particularly if the kid doesn't turn out as anticipated), this is all reasonable, moral, glaringly obvious. Better never to exist than be raised by crass Republican rubes. Still, whatever you deem the subject of the abortion, the underlying logic of destruction-for-protection-from-destruction remains. ![]() It's an embryo, a fetus, a clump of cells, maybe a potential baby. Of course, in this line of thought, what you're aborting generally isn't a baby, not yet. ![]() The couples are " automatically predators " and the babies their prey. It would be immoral to let them adopt-you wouldn't do it any more than you'd give a helpless bird to two cats. But regardless of the exact accusation, the course of action for anyone of conscience is clear: Don't let those people get babies. They might want a child to abuse, enslave, or kill, or maybe they want to brainwash more babies than they can biologically produce into sharing their religion and politics. It begins with the premise that these couples must have nefarious motives. The more obvious meaning of the hundreds of instances of this meme isn't about the invisible women at all. SCREW YOUR FREEDOM MEME HOW TO"It's that they're offering to adopt children resulting from fetuses women do not want to give birth to ," as writer Phoebe Maltz Bovy argued, adding : "They're telling a woman who's 6 weeks pregnant how to spend the next 9 months."Īnd maybe that is the message, but if so, it's remarkably poorly expressed. Were I to steel-man its meaning, I'd say the concern here is that expressed in the McSweeney's piece: It's about the (unpictured, unmentioned) pregnant women more than the pregnancy or would-be adopters. Each comes away sincerely convinced the other is not merely misguided or ignorant but evil-and I can see how they arrive at those conclusions, but I can't see how they'll find a way to work together around abortion post- Roe. Am I missing something?" asked one sweet summer child in response to the "vaguely creepy" post.) But beyond the meme itself, the way pro-life and pro-choice Americans look at the same image and see something wholly different is striking. Escher logic that makes perfect sense to its creators and not a whit to its critics. The meme itself is a curious thing, with a sort of M.C. I've watched the spread of "we will adopt your baby" with a morbid fascination. to puke your guts out before work, and when you also puke your guts out at work in the employee bathroom, we won't adopt that." "Obviously, we can't adopt your morning sickness, so when you wake up at 5 a.m. ![]() "We want that baby when it's nice and cute and fully formed, but we aren't planning on adopting anything else," they assiduously explain. From McSweeney's came a "short imagined monologue" by the pictured couple. ![]() "'We will adopt your baby' is the meme we wish we didn't need," explained a piece at Mic. " Even Bette Midler and Mark Hamill got in on the action, though the apogee of the genre is probably the cats: SCREW YOUR FREEDOM MEME MOVIEOr " sadistic Christian nationalis ," or likely abusers, or kidnappers, or enslavers, or rapists, or " treating people like livestock ," or " TERRIFYING " horror movie monsters, or serial killers, or at least " vaguely creepy-looking. Pro-lifers offering to adopt unwanted babies, the memes suggested, are pedophiles. Soon things took a turn, with Twitter users posting modified versions or captioning different images entirely with that same line. In each, a smiling couple holds a sign that speaks directly to women considering abortion: "We will adopt your baby." It started with a couple of photos from demonstrations marking the end of Roe v. You may have seen this meme going around Twitter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |